Was the resurrection of Jesus a fact of history or a figment of imagination? Was it an event that entailed a raised and transformed body and an empty tomb? Or was it a subjective, visionary experience--a collective delusion? In the view of many, the truth of Christianity hangs on the answer to this question.*Jesus' Resurrection: Fact or Figment?* is a lively and provocative debate between Christian philosopher and apologist William Lane Craig and New Testament scholar and atheist Gerd L�demann. This published version of a debate originally set at Boston College is edited by Paul Copan and Ronald K. Tacelli, who invite the responses of four additional scholars. Robert Gundry, a New Testament scholar, and Stephen Davis, a philosopher, argue in support of a historical and actual resurrection. Michael Goulder and Roy Hoover, both New Testament scholars, offer their support for Gerd L�demann's view that the "resurrection" was based on the guilt-induced visionary experience of the disciples. The book concludes with a final response from L�demann and Craig.words : 74677

trantor/en/Copan, Paul/Jesus' Resurrection · Fact or Figment_ · A Debate Between William Lane Craig & Gerd Ludemann.epub

zlib/no-category/Copan, Paul & Tacelli, Ronald K./Jesus' Resurrection · Fact or Figment? · A Debate Between William Lane Craig & Gerd Ludemann_30933149.epub

Jesus' resurrection : fact or figment : a debate between William Lane Craig and Gerd Ludemann

Jesus' resurrection : fact or figment? : a debate between William Lane Craig & Gerd Lüdemann

William Lane Craig; Gerd Lüdemann; Paul Copan; Ronald K Tacelli

edited by Paul Copan & Ronald K. Tacelli

InterVarsity Press

IVP Connect

United States, United States of America

Leicester, 2000

December 2000

FR, 2000

Includes bibliographical references.

Was the resurrection of Jesus a fact of history or a figment of imagination? Was it an event that entailed a raised and transformed body and an empty tomb? Or was it a subjective, visionary experience--a collective delusion? In the view of many, the truth of Christianity hangs on the answer to this question.
*Jesus' Resurrection: Fact or Figment?* is a lively and provocative debate between Christian philosopher and apologist William Lane Craig and New Testament scholar and atheist Gerd L�demann. This published version of a debate originally set at Boston College is edited by Paul Copan and Ronald K. Tacelli, who invite the responses of four additional scholars. Robert Gundry, a New Testament scholar, and Stephen Davis, a philosopher, argue in support of a historical and actual resurrection. Michael Goulder and Roy Hoover, both New Testament scholars, offer their support for Gerd L�demann's view that the "resurrection" was based on the guilt-induced visionary experience of the disciples. The book concludes with a final response from L�demann and Craig.
Comparative Religion,Religion & Spirituality,Christian Books & Bibles,History,Christian,Religion,Religious Studies,Christology,Theology,Religious Studies & Reference,Apologetics

"Jesus's Resurrection Fact or Figment? is a lively and provocative debate between Christian philosopher and apologist William Lane Craig and New Testament scholar and atheist Gerd Ludemann. This published version of a debate originally set at Boston College invites the responses of two additional scholars on either side of the issue.
Robert Gundry, a New Testament Scholar, and Stephen Davis, a philosopher, argue in support of a historical and actual resurrection, while Michael Goulder and Roy Hoover, both New Testament scholars, offer their support for Gerd Ludermann's view that the "resurrection" was based on the guilt-induced visionary experience of the disciples. The book concludes with a final response from Gerd Ludemann and from William Lane Craig."--BOOK JACKET.

Jesus' Resurrection : Fact or Figment? is a debate between Christian philosopher and apologist William Lane Craig and New Testament scholar and atheist Gerd Lüdemann. This published version of a debate originally set at Boston College invites the responses of two additional scholars on either side of the issue. Robert Gundry, a New Testament scholar, and Stephen Davis, a philosopher, argue in support of a historical and actual resurrection, while Michael Goulder and Roy Hoover, both New Testament scholars, offer their support for Gerd Lüdemann's view that the "resurrection" was based on the guilt-induced visionary experience of the disciples. The book concludes with a final response from Gerd Lüdemann and from William Lane Craig

Jesus' Resurrection: Fact or Figment? is a lively and provocative debate between Christian philosopher and apologist William Lane Craig and New Testament scholar and atheist Gerd Ludemann. This published version of a debate originally set at Boston College invites the responses of two additional scholars on either side of the debate. Robert Gundry, a New Testament scholar, and Stephen Davis, a philosopher, argue in support of a historical and actual resurrection, while Michael Goulder and Roy Hoover, both New Testament scholars, offer their support for Luedemann's view that the "resurrection" was based on the guilt-induced visionary experience of the disciples.

I'M VERY GRATEFUL FOR THE INVITATION TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS debate, and I consider it a real privilege to be discussing these issues with so prominent a scholar as Dr. Ludemann.

2024-06-27