反馈文件质量
ia/takingsprivatepr0000epst.pdf
Takings : Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain 🔍
Richard Allen Epstein Harvard University, Department of Sanskrit & Indian Studies, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1994
英语 [en] · PDF · 20.6MB · 1994 · 📗 未知类型的图书 · 🚀/ia · Save
描述
If legal scholar Richard Epstein is right, then the New Deal is wrong, if not unconstitutional. Epstein reaches this sweeping conclusion after making a detailed analysis of the eminent domain, or takings, clause of the Constitution, which states that private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation. In contrast to the other guarantees in the Bill of Rights, the eminent domain clause has been interpreted narrowly. It has been invoked to force the government to compensate a citizen when his land is taken to build a post office, but not when its value is diminished by a comprehensive zoning ordinance.
Epstein argues that this narrow interpretation is inconsistent with the language of the takings clause and the political theory that animates it. He develops a coherent normative theory that permits us to distinguish between permissible takings for public use and impermissible ones. He then examines a wide range of government regulations and taxes under a single comprehensive theory. He asks four questions: What constitutes a taking of private property? When is that taking justified without compensation under the police power? When is a taking for public use? And when is a taking compensated, in cash or in kind?
Zoning, rent control, progressive and special taxes, workers' compensation, and bankruptcy are only a few of the programs analyzed within this framework. Epstein's theory casts doubt upon the established view today that the redistribution of wealth is a proper function of government. Throughout the book he uses recent developments in law and economics and the theory of collective choice to find in the eminent domain clause a theory of political obligation that he claims is superior to any of its modern rivals.
备选作者
Epstein, Richard Allen, 1943-
备用出版商
Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
备用出版商
Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
备用版本
United States, United States of America
备用版本
7. print, Cambridge, Mass. [u.a, 1998
备用版本
Cambridge, Mass, Massachusetts, 1985
备用版本
Reprint, Cambridge, Jan. 1985
备用版本
Cambridge, Mass, 1994, ©1985
备用版本
Revised ed., US, 1985
备用版本
September 29, 2005
备用版本
October 28, 1985
备用版本
S.L, 2005
元数据中的注释
Obscured text on back cover due to sticker attached.
元数据中的注释
Includes bibliographical references and indexes.
备用描述
If legal scholar Richard Epstein is right, then the New Deal is wrong, if not unconstitutional. Epstein develops a coherent normative theory that permits us to distinguish between permissible takings for public use and impermissible ones. He then examines a wide range of government regulations and taxes under a single comprehensive theory. If legal scholar Richard Epstein is right, then the New Deal is wrong, if not unconstitutional. Epstein reaches this sweeping conclusion after making a detailed analysis of the eminent domain, or takings, clause of the Constitution, which states that private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation. In contrast to the other guarantees in the Bill of Rights, the eminent domain clause has been interpreted narrowly. It has been invoked to force the government to compensate a citizen when his land is taken to build a post office, but not when its value is diminished by a comprehensive zoning ordinance. Epstein argues that this narrow interpretation is inconsistent with the language of the takings clause and the political theory that animates it. He develops a coherent normative theory that permits us to distinguish between permissible takings for public use and impermissible ones. He then examines a wide range of government regulations and taxes under a single comprehensive theory. He asks four questions: What constitutes a taking of private property? When is that taking justified without compensation under the police power? When is a taking for public use? And when is a taking compensated, in cash or in kind? Zoning, rent control, progressive and special taxes, workers' compensation, and bankruptcy are only a few of the programs analyzed within this framework. Epstein's theory casts doubt upon the established view today that the redistribution of wealth is a proper function of government. Throughout the book he uses recent developments in law and economics and the theory of collective choice to find in the eminent domain clause a theory of political obligation that he claims is superior to any of its modern rivals
备用描述
xi, 362 pages ; 25 cm
Includes bibliographical references and indexes
Part 1. Philosophical preliminaries: A tale of two pies; Hobbesian man, Lockean world; The integrity of constitutional text -- Part 2. Takings prima facie: Takings and torts; Partial takings: the unity of ownership; Possession and use; Rights of disposition and contract; Taking from many: liability rules, regulations, and taxes -- Part 3. Justifications for takings: The police power: ends; The police power: means; Consent and assumption of risk -- Part 4. Public use and just compensation: Public use; Explicit compensation; Implicit in-kind compensation; Property and the common pool; Tort; Regulation; Taxation; Transfer payments and welfare rights -- Conclusion. Philosophical implications
开源日期
2023-06-28
更多信息……

🚀 快速下载

成为会员以支持书籍、论文等的长期保存。为了感谢您对我们的支持，您将获得高速下载权益。❤️
如果您在本月捐款，您将获得双倍的快速下载次数。

🐢 低速下载

由可信的合作方提供。 更多信息请参见常见问题解答。 （可能需要验证浏览器——无限次下载！）

所有选项下载的文件都相同，应该可以安全使用。即使这样，从互联网下载文件时始终要小心。例如，确保您的设备更新及时。
显示外部下载
  • 对于大文件，我们建议使用下载管理器以防止中断。
    推荐的下载管理器：JDownloader
  • 您将需要一个电子书或 PDF 阅读器来打开文件，具体取决于文件格式。
    推荐的电子书阅读器：Anna的档案在线查看器、ReadEra和Calibre
  • 使用在线工具进行格式转换。
    推荐的转换工具：CloudConvert和PrintFriendly
  • 您可以将 PDF 和 EPUB 文件发送到您的 Kindle 或 Kobo 电子阅读器。
    推荐的工具：亚马逊的“发送到 Kindle”和djazz 的“发送到 Kobo/Kindle”
  • 支持作者和图书馆
    ✍️ 如果您喜欢这个并且能够负担得起，请考虑购买原版，或直接支持作者。
    📚 如果您当地的图书馆有这本书，请考虑在那里免费借阅。