反馈文件质量
nexusstc/Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain/87f86bb5954047093e70eed4e0881079.pdf
Takings : Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain 🔍
Richard Allen Epstein Harvard University, Department of Sanskrit & Indian Studies, Cambridge, Mass, Massachusetts, 1985
英语 [en] · PDF · 14.5MB · 1985 · 📘 非小说类图书 · 🚀/lgli/lgrs/nexusstc/zlib · Save
描述
If legal scholar Richard Epstein is right, then the New Deal is wrong, if not unconstitutional. Epstein reaches this sweeping conclusion after making a detailed analysis of the eminent domain, or takings, clause of the Constitution, which states that private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation. In contrast to the other guarantees in the Bill of Rights, the eminent domain clause has been interpreted narrowly. It has been invoked to force the government to compensate a citizen when his land is taken to build a post office, but not when its value is diminished by a comprehensive zoning ordinance.
Epstein argues that this narrow interpretation is inconsistent with the language of the takings clause and the political theory that animates it. He develops a coherent normative theory that permits us to distinguish between permissible takings for public use and impermissible ones. He then examines a wide range of government regulations and taxes under a single comprehensive theory. He asks four questions: What constitutes a taking of private property? When is that taking justified without compensation under the police power? When is a taking for public use? And when is a taking compensated, in cash or in kind?
Zoning, rent control, progressive and special taxes, workers' compensation, and bankruptcy are only a few of the programs analyzed within this framework. Epstein's theory casts doubt upon the established view today that the redistribution of wealth is a proper function of government. Throughout the book he uses recent developments in law and economics and the theory of collective choice to find in the eminent domain clause a theory of political obligation that he claims is superior to any of its modern rivals.
备用文件名
lgli/_330597.87f86bb5954047093e70eed4e0881079.pdf
备用文件名
lgrsnf/_330597.87f86bb5954047093e70eed4e0881079.pdf
备用文件名
zlib/Jurisprudence & Law/General & Miscellaneous Law/Richard A. Epstein/Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain_1052689.pdf
备选作者
Epstein, Richard A.
备用出版商
Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
备用版本
Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1994
备用版本
United States, United States of America
备用版本
7. print, Cambridge, Mass. [u.a, 1998
备用版本
Reprint, Cambridge, Jan. 1985
备用版本
Cambridge, Mass, 1994, ©1985
备用版本
Revised ed., US, 1985
备用版本
September 29, 2005
备用版本
October 28, 1985
备用版本
S.L, 2005
元数据中的注释
до 2011-08
元数据中的注释
lg613440
元数据中的注释
{"isbns":["0674867289","0674867297","9780674867284","9780674867291"],"last_page":377,"publisher":"Harvard University Press"}
元数据中的注释
Includes bibliographical references and indexes.
备用描述
If legal scholar Richard Epstein is right, then the New Deal is wrong, if not unconstitutional. Epstein develops a coherent normative theory that permits us to distinguish between permissible takings for public use and impermissible ones. He then examines a wide range of government regulations and taxes under a single comprehensive theory. If legal scholar Richard Epstein is right, then the New Deal is wrong, if not unconstitutional. Epstein reaches this sweeping conclusion after making a detailed analysis of the eminent domain, or takings, clause of the Constitution, which states that private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation. In contrast to the other guarantees in the Bill of Rights, the eminent domain clause has been interpreted narrowly. It has been invoked to force the government to compensate a citizen when his land is taken to build a post office, but not when its value is diminished by a comprehensive zoning ordinance. Epstein argues that this narrow interpretation is inconsistent with the language of the takings clause and the political theory that animates it. He develops a coherent normative theory that permits us to distinguish between permissible takings for public use and impermissible ones. He then examines a wide range of government regulations and taxes under a single comprehensive theory. He asks four questions: What constitutes a taking of private property? When is that taking justified without compensation under the police power? When is a taking for public use? And when is a taking compensated, in cash or in kind? Zoning, rent control, progressive and special taxes, workers' compensation, and bankruptcy are only a few of the programs analyzed within this framework. Epstein's theory casts doubt upon the established view today that the redistribution of wealth is a proper function of government. Throughout the book he uses recent developments in law and economics and the theory of collective choice to find in the eminent domain clause a theory of political obligation that he claims is superior to any of its modern rivals
备用描述
Contents......Page 14
PART I Philosophical Preliminaries......Page 16
1. A Tale of Two Pies......Page 18
2. Hobbesian Man, Lockean World......Page 22
3. The Integrity of Constitutional Text......Page 34
PART II Takings Prima Facie......Page 48
4. Takings and Torts......Page 50
5. Partial Takings: The Unity of Ownership......Page 72
6. Possession and Use......Page 78
7. Rights of Disposition and Contract......Page 89
8. Taking from Many: Liability Rules, Regulations, and Taxes......Page 108
PART III Justifications for Takings......Page 120
9. The Police Power: Ends......Page 122
10. The Police Power: Means......Page 141
11. Consent and Assumption of Risk......Page 161
PART IV Public Use and Just Compensation......Page 174
12. Public Use......Page 176
13. Explicit Compensation......Page 197
14. Implicit In-Kind Compensation......Page 210
15. Property and the Common Pool......Page 231
16. Tort......Page 244
17. Regulation......Page 278
18. Taxation......Page 298
19. Transfer Payments and Welfare Rights......Page 321
CONCLUSION Philosophical Implications......Page 346
Index of Cases......Page 368
General Index......Page 373
开源日期
2011-08-31
更多信息……

🚀 快速下载

成为会员以支持书籍、论文等的长期保存。为了感谢您对我们的支持，您将获得高速下载权益。❤️

🐢 低速下载

由可信的合作方提供。 更多信息请参见常见问题解答。 （可能需要验证浏览器——无限次下载！）

所有选项下载的文件都相同，应该可以安全使用。即使这样，从互联网下载文件时始终要小心。例如，确保您的设备更新及时。
显示外部下载
  • 对于大文件，我们建议使用下载管理器以防止中断。
    推荐的下载管理器：JDownloader
  • 您将需要一个电子书或 PDF 阅读器来打开文件，具体取决于文件格式。
    推荐的电子书阅读器：Anna的档案在线查看器、ReadEra和Calibre
  • 使用在线工具进行格式转换。
    推荐的转换工具：CloudConvert和PrintFriendly
  • 您可以将 PDF 和 EPUB 文件发送到您的 Kindle 或 Kobo 电子阅读器。
    推荐的工具：亚马逊的“发送到 Kindle”和djazz 的“发送到 Kobo/Kindle”
  • 支持作者和图书馆
    ✍️ 如果您喜欢这个并且能够负担得起，请考虑购买原版，或直接支持作者。
    📚 如果您当地的图书馆有这本书，请考虑在那里免费借阅。