In the 60's, the work of Anderson, Chernavski, Kirby and Edwards showed that the group of homeomorphisms of a smooth manifold which are isotopic to the identity is a simple group. This led Smale to conjecture that the group Diff''(M)o of cr diffeomorphisms, r ~ 1, of a smooth manifold M, with compact supports, and isotopic to the identity through compactly supported isotopies, is a simple group as well. In this monograph, we give a fairly detailed proof that DifF(M)o is a simple group. This theorem was proved by Herman in the case M is the torus rn in 1971, as a consequence of the Nash-Moser-Sergeraert implicit function theorem. Thurston showed in 1974 how Herman's result on rn implies the general theorem for any smooth manifold M. The key idea was to vision an isotopy in Diff''(M) as a foliation on M x [0, 1]. In fact he discovered a deep connection between the local homology of the group of diffeomorphisms and the homology of the Haefliger classifying space for foliations. Thurston's paper [180] contains just a brief sketch of the proof. The details have been worked out by Mather [120], [124], [125], and the author [12]. This circle of ideas that we call the'Thurston tricks'is discussed in chapter 2. It explains how in certain groups of diffeomorphisms, perfectness leads to simplicity. In connection with these ideas, we discuss Epstein's theory [52], which we apply to contact diffeomorphisms in chapter 6.

zlib/no-category/Banyaga, Augustin/The Structure of Classical Diffeomorphism Groups ||_62761809.pdf

Banyaga, Augustin

Kluwer Academic

Mathematics and its applications (Kluwer Academic Publishers), Dordrecht, ©1997

Mathematics and Its Applications, 400, Boston, MA, 1997

United States, United States of America

Springer Nature, New York, NY, 2013

sm30387000

In The 60's, The Work Of Anderson, Chernavski, Kirby And Edwards Showed That The Group Of Homeomorphisms Of A Smooth Manifold Which Are Isotopic To The Identity Is A Simple Group. This Led Smale To Conjecture That The Group Diff' (m)o Of Cr Diffeomorphisms, R ~ 1, Of A Smooth Manifold M, With Compact Supports, And Isotopic To The Identity Through Compactly Supported Isotopies, Is A Simple Group As Well. In This Monograph, We Give A Fairly Detailed Proof That Diff(m)o Is A Simple Group. This Theorem Was Proved By Herman In The Case M Is The Torus Rn In 1971, As A Consequence Of The Nash-moser-sergeraert Implicit Function Theorem. Thurston Showed In 1974 How Herman's Result On Rn Implies The General Theorem For Any Smooth Manifold M. The Key Idea Was To Vision An Isotopy In Diff'(m) As A Foliation On M X [0, 1]. In Fact He Discovered A Deep Connection Between The Local Homology Of The Group Of Diffeomorphisms And The Homology Of The Haefliger Classifying Space For Foliations. Thurston's Paper [180] Contains Just A Brief Sketch Of The Proof. The Details Have Been Worked Out By Mather [120], [124], [125], And The Author [12]. This Circle Of Ideas That We Call The Thurston Tricks Is Discussed In Chapter 2. It Explains How In Certain Groups Of Diffeomorphisms, Perfectness Leads To Simplicity. In Connection With These Ideas, We Discuss Epstein's Theory [52], Which We Apply To Contact Diffeomorphisms In Chapter 6.

The book introduces and explains most of the main techniques and ideas in the study of the structure of diffeomorphism groups. A quite complete proof of Thurston's theorem on the simplicity of some diffeomorphism groups is given. The method of the proof is generalized to symplectic and volume-preserving diffeomorphisms. The Mather-Thurston theory relating foliations with diffeomorphism groups is outlined. A central role is played by the flux homomorphism. Various cohomology classes connected with the flux are defined on the group of diffeomorphisms. The main results on the structure of diffeomorphism groups are applied to showing that classical structures are determined by their automorphism groups, a contribution to the Erlanger Program of Klein. Audience: Graduate students and researchers in mathematics and physics.

2015-07-27