The concept of this volume is that the paradigm of European national languages (official orthography; language standardization; full use of language in most everyday contexts) is imposed in cookie-cutter fashion on most language revitalization efforts of Native American languages. While this model fits the sovereign status of many Native American groups, it does not meet the linguistic ideology of Native American communities, and creates projects and products that do not engage the communities which they are intended to serve. The concern over heritage language loss has generated since 1990 enormous activity that is supposed to restore full private and public function of heritage languages in Native American speech communities. The thinking goes: if you do what the volume terms the "Lost Language Ghost Dance," your heritage language will flourish once more. Yet the heritage language only flourishes on paper, and not in any meaningful way for the community it is trying to help. Instead, this volume proposes a model of Native American language revitalization that is different from the national/official language model, one that respects and incorporates language variation, and entertains variable outcomes. This is because it is based on Native American linguistic ideologies. This volume argues that the cookie-cutter application of the official language ideology is unethical because it undermines the intent of language revitalization itself: the continued daily, meaningful use of a heritage language in its speech community.
Erscheinungsdatum: 10.04.2014

lgrsnf/G:\!genesis\1\_missing\d2eb5b655c3b9c8f6b96941b47b0f3af.pdf

nexusstc/Linguistic Ideologies of Native American Language Revitalization: Doing the Lost Language Ghost Dance/d2eb5b655c3b9c8f6b96941b47b0f3af.pdf

zlib/Languages/Grammar, dictionaries & phrasebooks/David Leedom Shaul (auth.)/Linguistic Ideologies of Native American Language Revitalization: Doing the Lost Language Ghost Dance_2351688.pdf

Leedom Shaul, David

Shaul, David Leedom

Springer Nature Switzerland AG

Springer London, Limited

SpringerBriefs in anthropology, Cham [Switzerland, 2014

Springer briefs in anthropology, Cham, 2014

Anthropology and ethics, Cham, 2014

Springer Nature, Cham, 2014

Switzerland, Switzerland

2014, US, 2014

Apr 01, 2014

lg1183229

{"container_title":"SpringerBriefs in Anthropology","edition":"1","isbns":["3319052926","3319052934","9783319052922","9783319052939"],"issns":["2195-0806","2195-0814"],"last_page":62,"publisher":"Springer","series":"SpringerBriefs in Anthropology"}

Source title: Linguistic Ideologies of Native American Language Revitalization: Doing the Lost Language Ghost Dance (SpringerBriefs in Anthropology)

"The concept of this volume is that the paradigm of European national languages (official orthography; language standardization; full use of language in most everyday contexts) is imposed in cookie-cutter fashion on most language revitalization efforts of Native American languages. While this model fits the sovereign status of many Native American groups, it does not meet the linguistic ideology of Native American communities, and creates projects and products that do not engage the communities which they are intended to serve. The concern over heritage language loss has generated since 1990 enormous activity that is supposed to restore full private and public function of heritage languages in Native American speech communities. The thinking goes: if you do what the volume terms the "Lost Language Ghost Dance," your heritage language will flourish once more. Yet the heritage language only flourishes on paper, and not in any meaningful way for the community it is trying to help. Instead, this volume proposes a model of Native American language revitalization that is different from the national/official language model, one that respects and incorporates language variation, and entertains variable outcomes. This is because it is based on Native American linguistic ideologies. This volume argues that the cookie-cutter application of the official language ideology is unethical because it undermines the intent of language revitalization itself: the continued daily, meaningful use of a heritage language in its speech community. ." -- Prové de l'editor

"The idea behind the book is that the paradigm of European national languages (official orthography; language standardization; full use of language in most everyday contexts) is imposed in cookie-cutter fashion on many language revitalization projects of Native American languages. This is the offical language model. While this model fits the sovereign status of many Native American groups, it does not meet the linguistic ideology of Native American communities, and creates projects and products that do not engage the communities which they are created to serve"--Vii

Front Matter....Pages i-xiii
Languages and Language Loss....Pages 1-9
Language Preservation Begets Language Documentation....Pages 11-21
Language Acquisition vs. Language Learning....Pages 23-30
Language Revitalization and Revival....Pages 31-44
Linguistic Ideologies of Language Revitalization....Pages 45-53
Four “Laws” of Language Revitalization....Pages 55-58
Back Matter....Pages 59-62

2014-06-12