zlib/Society, Politics & Philosophy/Government & Politics/Mark R. Levin/Men in Black: How the Supreme Court Is Destroying America_23730188.epub
Men in Black : How the Supreme Court Is Destroying America 🔍
Mark Levin, Mark R. Levin
Regnery Publishing, Inc., Simon & Schuster, Washington, DC, 2006
英语 [en] · EPUB · 1.0MB · 2006 · 📘 非小说类图书 · 🚀/zlib · Save
描述
The bestselling Men in Black-first time in paperback! Lawyer and hugely popular radio talk show host Mark Levin throws the book at out-of-control liberal judges who ignore the Constitution, dismantle the rights of American citizens, and make up their own coercive law from the bench.Amazon.com ReviewConservative talk radio host, lawyer, and frequent National Review contributor Mark R. Levin comes out firing against the United States Supreme Court in Men in Black, accusing the institution of corrupting the ideals of America's founding fathers. The court, in Levin's estimation, pursues an ideology-based activist agenda that oversteps its authority within the government. Levin examines several decisions in the court's history to illustrate his point, beginning with the landmark Marbury v. Madison case, wherein the court granted itself the power to declare acts of the other branches of government unconstitutional. He devotes later chapters to other key cases culminating in modern issues such as same-sex marriage and the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform bill. Like effective attorneys do, Levin packs in copious research material and delivers his points with tremendous vigor, excoriating the justices for instances where he feels strict constit utional constructivism gave way to biased interpretation. But Levin's definition of "activism" seems inconsistent. In the case of McCain-Feingold, the court declined to rule on a bill already passed by congress and signed by the president, but Levin, who thinks the bill violates the First Amendment, still accuses them of activism even when they were actually passive. To his talk-radio listeners, Levin's hard-charging style and dire warnings of the court's direction will strike a resonant tone of alarm, though the hyperbole may be a bit off-putting to the uninitiated. As an attack on the vagaries of decisions rendered by the Supreme Court and on some current justices, Men in Black scores points and will likely lead sympathetic juries to conviction. --John MoeFrom Publishers WeeklyThe Supreme Court is speeding the country on the road to tyranny, according to this jeremiad from Levin, a conservative constitutional lawyer and radio talk show host. Levin argues that the Constitution is under siege by "judicial activists" obsessed with remaking America to reflect their personal political and moral philosophies. Liberal judges who view the Constitution as a document whose meaning evolves over time are at odds with the founding fathers' "clear and profound vision for what they wanted our federal government to be." "Activist judges," he says, "make, rather than interpret, the law." The author champions originalism, the conservative legal philosophy hinging on a narrow interpretation of the Constitution's text, and he contends that moving the judiciary back into the originalist fold could thwart the power grab by "radicals in robes." Levin traces trends in judicial activism through some of the Supreme Court's most famous cases, from Marbury v. Madison (1803), which enshrined the high court's power to weigh the constitutionality of presidential and congressional acts, to Roe v. Wade (1973). He also blasts affirmative action decisions, contending that the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause should be sufficient to combat racial discrimination. Levin is an ardent advocate, but at times his strident tone gets in the way of objective analyses of the system's flaws. Would the founders be as "appalled" by the present-day Supreme Court as Levin is? That's impossible to say, but many likeminded critics are certain to be galvanized by this spirited "clarion call," which is bookended by raves from conservative radio broadcaster Rush Limbaugh and former U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese III. Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
备用版本
United States, United States of America
备用版本
1st pbk. ed, Washington, D.C, 2006
备用版本
September 25, 2006
备用版本
Annotated, 2006
备用描述
'A modern conservative classic.'- Sean Hannity'Men in Black couldn't be more timely or important....a tremendously important and compelling book.” - Rush Limbaugh “One of the finest books on the Constitution and the judiciary I've read in a long time....There is no better source for understanding and grasping the seriousness of this issue.” - Edwin Meese III“The Supreme Court has broken through the firewalls constructed by the framers to limit judicial power.” “America's founding fathers had a clear and profound vision for what they wanted our federal government to be,” says constitutional scholar Mark R. Levin in his explosive book, Men in Black. “But today, our out-of-control Supreme Court imperiously strikes down laws and imposes new ones to suit its own liberal whims––robbing us of our basic freedoms and the values on which our country was founded.” In Men in Black: How the Supreme Court Is Destroying America, Levin exposes countless examples of outrageous Supreme Court abuses, from promoting racism in college admissions, expelling God and religion from the public square, forcing states to confer benefits on illegal aliens, and endorsing economic socialism to upholding partial-birth abortion, restraining political speech, and anointing terrorists with rights. Levin writes: “Barely one hundred justices have served on the United States Supreme Court. They're unelected, they're virtually unaccountable, they're largely unknown to most Americans, and they serve for life...in many ways the justices are more powerful than members of Congress and the president.... As few as five justices can and do dictate economic, cultural, criminal, and security policy for the entire nation.” In Men in Black, you will learn:How the Supreme Court protects virtual child pornography and flag burning as forms of free speech but denies teenagers the right to hear an invocation mentioning God at a high school graduation ceremony because it might be “coercive.”How a former Klansman and virulently anti-Catholic Supreme Court justice inserted the words “wall of separation” between church and state in a 1947 Supreme Court decision––a phrase repeated today by those who claim to stand for civil liberty.How Justice Harry Blackmun, a one-time conservative appointee and the author of Roe v. Wade, was influenced by fan mail much like an entertainer or politician, which helped him to evolve into an ardent activist for gay rights and against the death penalty.How the Supreme Court has dictated that illegal aliens have a constitutional right to attend public schools, and that other immigrants qualify for welfare benefits, tuition assistance, and even civil service jobs.
备用描述
<p><P>The bestselling Men in Black--first time in paperback! Lawyer and hugely popular radio talk show host Mark Levin throws the book at out-of-control liberal judges who ignore the Constitution, dismantle the rights of American citizens, and make up their own coercive law from the bench.</p>
开源日期
2022-12-30
🚀 快速下载
成为会员以支持书籍、论文等的长期保存。为了感谢您对我们的支持,您将获得高速下载权益。❤️
🐢 低速下载
由可信的合作方提供。 更多信息请参见常见问题解答。 (可能需要验证浏览器——无限次下载!)
- 低速服务器(合作方提供) #1 (稍快但需要排队)
- 低速服务器(合作方提供) #2 (稍快但需要排队)
- 低速服务器(合作方提供) #3 (稍快但需要排队)
- 低速服务器(合作方提供) #4 (稍快但需要排队)
- 低速服务器(合作方提供) #5 (无需排队,但可能非常慢)
- 低速服务器(合作方提供) #6 (无需排队,但可能非常慢)
- 低速服务器(合作方提供) #7 (无需排队,但可能非常慢)
- 低速服务器(合作方提供) #8 (无需排队,但可能非常慢)
- 低速服务器(合作方提供) #9 (无需排队,但可能非常慢)
- 下载后: 在我们的查看器中打开
所有选项下载的文件都相同,应该可以安全使用。即使这样,从互联网下载文件时始终要小心。例如,确保您的设备更新及时。
外部下载
-
对于大文件,我们建议使用下载管理器以防止中断。
推荐的下载管理器:JDownloader -
您将需要一个电子书或 PDF 阅读器来打开文件,具体取决于文件格式。
推荐的电子书阅读器:Anna的档案在线查看器、ReadEra和Calibre -
使用在线工具进行格式转换。
推荐的转换工具:CloudConvert和PrintFriendly -
您可以将 PDF 和 EPUB 文件发送到您的 Kindle 或 Kobo 电子阅读器。
推荐的工具:亚马逊的“发送到 Kindle”和djazz 的“发送到 Kobo/Kindle” -
支持作者和图书馆
✍️ 如果您喜欢这个并且能够负担得起,请考虑购买原版,或直接支持作者。
📚 如果您当地的图书馆有这本书,请考虑在那里免费借阅。
下面的文字仅以英文继续。
总下载量:
“文件的MD5”是根据文件内容计算出的哈希值,并且基于该内容具有相当的唯一性。我们这里索引的所有影子图书馆都主要使用MD5来标识文件。
一个文件可能会出现在多个影子图书馆中。有关我们编译的各种数据集的信息,请参见数据集页面。
有关此文件的详细信息,请查看其JSON 文件。 Live/debug JSON version. Live/debug page.