This work is a record of a roundtable devoted to the boundary between phonology and morphology and an attempt to define the term "morphonology". It contains papers on the related topics of "morphoprosody" and the "lexicon", views from "the floor" and "the outside", and edited transcripts of the discussions that took place at the Montreal Roundtable in October 1994.

lgli/_526814.fd18fdabdf200346a8f6b8c2dd7fb936.pdf

lgrsnf/_526814.fd18fdabdf200346a8f6b8c2dd7fb936.pdf

zlib/Languages/Grammar, dictionaries & phrasebooks/Rajendra Singh, Richard Desrochers/Trubetzkoy's Orphan: Proceedings of the Montréal Roundtable ''Morphonology: Contemporary Responses'', Montréal, October 1994_1254355.pdf

Trubetzkoy's Orphan: Proceedings of the Montreal Roundtable "Morphonology: Contemporary Responses", Montreal, October 1994 (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory ... IV: Current Issues in Linguistic Theory)

Trubetzkoy's Orphan : proceedings of the Montréal Roundtable Morphonology: Contemporary Responses ; (Montréal, September 30 - October 2, 1994)

Montreal Roundtable Morphonology: Contemporary Responses, Rajendra Singh, Richard Desrochers, Montréal Roundtable "Morphonology: Contemporary Responses" (1994 Montréal, Québec)

Montreal Roundtable Morphonology: Contemporary Responses (1994 Montr;singh, Rajendra;desrochers, Richard

Rajendra Singh; Round Table Morphonology: Contemporary Responses (1994, Montréal)

edited by Rajendra Singh; with the collaboration of Richard Desrochers

John Benjamins BV

Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science., v. 144, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, Netherlands, 1996

John Benjamins Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1996

United States, United States of America

Netherlands, Netherlands

November 1996

1994

0

lg816553

{"edition":"1","isbns":["1556195990","9027236488","9781556195990","9789027236487"],"last_page":378,"publisher":"John Benjamins","series":"Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 144"}

Includes bibliographical references and index.

TRUBETZKOY'S ORPHAN......Page 2
Editorial page......Page 3
Title page
......Page 4
Copyright page......Page 5
Acknowledgements......Page 8
Table of contents......Page 12
List of contributors......Page 14
Editor's Foreword......Page 16
2. Les données du problème......Page 18
3. Les tendances actuelles......Page 20
4.1 Les données......Page 22
4.2 Pour une morphophonologie diachronique......Page 23
5. Conclusion......Page 24
I. ALLOMORPHY AND MORPHOPHONOLOGY......Page 26
1. Locating the Morphology/Phonology Boundary......Page 28
2. Types of Morpholexical Selection......Page 33
3. Allomorphy as Morphological Selection......Page 35
3.1 The Parallelism with Morphological Gaps......Page 36
3.3 Locality......Page 37
3.4 The Interaction of Morphology and Phonology......Page 39
4. The Existence of Morphologically Conditioned Phonological Rules......Page 40
1. Introductory Remarks......Page 47
2. Features, Morphemes and Morphs......Page 48
3.1 Three Positions on Allomorphy......Page 50
3.2 Arguments Against Allomorphy as Replacement......Page 52
3.3 Is Allomorphy a Pairing between Features and Morphs?......Page 53
4. Conclusions......Page 56
On the Morphology/Phonology Boundary:Comments on Kiparsky......Page 58
Reply to Mohanan and Walker......Page 63
Allomorphy and Morphophonology......Page 70
II. MODULARITY, MORPHONOLOGY, AND GRADIENCE......Page 80
2. Functional Analysis......Page 82
3. Functionalism and Morphonology......Page 84
4. A Semiotic Model of Morphonology: Level of universalpreference theory......Page 87
5. Diachronic Morphonological Change......Page 91
7. Remarks on the System Adequacy of Morphonology......Page 95
8. Conclusion......Page 96
Form & Content in a Functionalist Semiotic Model of Morphonology: Comments on Dressier......Page 99
On A Functionalist Semiotic Model of Morphonology: Comments on Dressier......Page 112
Reply to Janda and Walker......Page 117
A Functionalist Semiotic Model of Morphonology......Page 121
III. LINGUISTICS WITHOUT MORPHOPHONOLOGY......Page 132
Quelques avantages d'une linguistique débarrassée de lamorpho(pho)nologie......Page 134
1. Compositionality of Words......Page 155
2.1 Compositional morphology......Page 157
2.2 Non-Compositional Morphology......Page 158
3. Morphology and Phonology......Page 162
4. Autonomous Phonology......Page 164
5. Conclusions......Page 169
"Même après le débrouillement il peut rester de la brume":Comments on Ford & Singh......Page 170
Reply to Mohanan and Janda......Page 181
Linguistics without Morphophonology......Page 186
IV. MORPHOPROSODY......Page 202
0. Morphoprosody......Page 204
1. Morphoprosody and Stress Types......Page 205
3. Morphoprosody as Interaction......Page 207
4. Types of Morphoprosodical Interaction......Page 208
6. Derivation, Inflection, and Stress......Page 215
7. Interactional effects......Page 216
8. Morphoprosody and Diachrony......Page 218
9. Non-Concatenative Inflection......Page 220
10. Prosodic Inflection......Page 221
11. The Syllable in Morphoprosody......Page 223
13. Generalizations on Morphoprosody......Page 224
15. Hierarchical Structure......Page 225
16. Bottom-up Analyses......Page 227
18. Motifs......Page 230
Another view of Prosody and Morphology:Comments on Hurch......Page 237
Reply to Piggott......Page 244
Morphoprosody......Page 247
V. PRODUCTIVITY AND THE LEXICON......Page 260
Productivity, Regularity and Fusion:How language use affects the lexicon......Page 262
1. The Network Model......Page 263
2.1 Productivity......Page 265
2.2 Regularity......Page 266
3. The Relations among Productivity, Regularity and Fusion......Page 267
3.1 The Diachronic Source of Morphology......Page 268
3.2 Inflection......Page 270
3.3 Derivational Morphology......Page 272
3.4 The Synchronic Relations Among Productivity, Regularity and Transparency......Page 273
4. The Dual-Processing Model......Page 276
5. Level-Ordered Morphology......Page 277
6. Language Acquisition......Page 280
7. Conclusion......Page 284
0. Preliminaries......Page 285
1. Frequency and Productivity......Page 286
2. Denominal Verbs......Page 288
3. A Hybrid Model of Inflectional Morphology......Page 290
4. Specific Language Impairment......Page 291
1. English Denominal Verbs......Page 295
2. Inflectional Morphology in Individuals with Specific LanguageImpairment......Page 296
Productivity and the lexicon......Page 299
VI. SOME ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTIONS......Page 310
1. Introduction......Page 312
2. Three Models of Morphophonology......Page 314
3. The Non-Natural Basis of Morphophonology......Page 316
4. Switch from Iconicity to Indexicality......Page 319
5. Morphemes As Chunks of Sounds......Page 329
6. The Derived Nature of the Parts of Words......Page 331
1. Language Design......Page 333
2. Shapes of Linguistic Nature......Page 334
3. Words Not Morphs Writ Large......Page 337
4. Free Forms, Free Functions, Relativized......Page 339
5. From Form to Substance......Page 345
References......Page 350
Index......Page 374

In putting ‘morphonology'up for adoption as a chapitre particulier in 1929, Trubetzkoy started a debate regarding the boundary between phonology and morphology that has not ended yet. Essentially a record of a roundtable devoted to that boundary (Montréal, October 1994), Trubetzkoy's Orphan is a full and fascinating picture of some very important contemporary attempts to define it. In addition to papers that focus on it, the volume also contains important papers on the closely related topics of ‘morphoprosody'and the ‘lexicon', views from ‘the floor'and ‘the outside', and edited transcripts of the discussions that took place at the Montréal Roundtable.Intended both for practicising and future phonologists and morpho-logists, Trubetzkoy's Orphan is a valuable record of a very important debate regarding one of the most central questions in phonology and morphology.

These conference proceedings cover such topics in linguistic theory as: allomorphy and morphophonology; modularity, mor(pho)nology, and gradience; linguistics without morphophonology; productivity and the lexicon; and morphoprosody.

2012-03-09